Showing posts with label Google. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Google. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Making sense of Google's seemingly whacky concepts

San Francisco: In its self-proclaimed drive to make the world a better place, Google has immersed itself in far more than Internet search and online ads. But driverless cars and a wind energy farm in the Atlantic Ocean?
It may not always be immediately apparent to frustrated investors - they wish management would be more frugal and focus more on the stock price - but there's usually some calculated logic underlying Google's unconventional strategy.
Google's brain trust - founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin, along with CEO Eric Schmidt - clearly think differently than most corporate leaders, and may eventually encourage more companies to take risks that might not pay off for years, if ever.
The time is ripe for long-term thinking, with memories still fresh of the financial meltdown - a byproduct of Wall Street's demands for companies to deliver ever-higher profits every three months and meet earnings targets set by analysts.
"Everywhere you look in this country, it seems that we are suffering from the consequences of too much short-term thinking," said longtime Silicon Valley forecaster Paul Saffo, managing director of foresight for Discern Analytics.
"Google doesn't have this disease," he said. "It is one of the few lone bright spots we have in that regard."
Even so, it might be difficult to fathom how Google can justify paying for the development of robotic technology that has driven cars thousands of miles on California roads without a major accident and committing potentially hundreds of millions of dollars to help build a wind farm hundreds of miles from the Eastern Seaboard.
With a little imagination, it's easier to see how Google might benefit. For instance, Saffo surmises that the driverless technology eventually could be implanted into a fleet of vehicles used for car sharing.
Google then could use a camera to take new pictures of streets and highways that appear in its online maps, another example of a service that once seemed like a diversion from its Internet search engine but is now an indispensable tool that helps the company sell advertising.
The company announced Tuesday it would buy a 37.5 percent stake in the Atlantic Ocean wind energy project, investing in a network of deepwater transmission lines to bring power from still-to-be-built offshore wind farms.
That makes more sense when you realize Google already sucks up massive amounts of energy from the power grid and expects to consume even more in the next decade as it opens more data centers filled with row upon row of computers to run its Internet services.
And if the value of renewable energy rises, as many analysts expect, Google eventually could even sell its stake for a tidy profit.
Or it could turn out to be a total bust, something Page and Brin warned potential investors could happen in April 2004 when they laid out their iconoclastic approach to business before Google sold its stock in an initial public offering.
"Our long-term focus may simply be the wrong business strategy," they warned. "Competitors may be rewarded for short-term tactics and grow stronger as a result. As potential investors, you should consider the risks around our long-term focus."
The Google founders also told investors that the company would be willing to finance projects with just a 10 percent chance of yielding a return of at least $ 1 billion - bets that seem "very speculative or even strange."
Google's transparency about its unorthodox ways may be one reason the company hasn't been stung yet by an outcry from its shareholders, although most analysts agree the stock price probably would be higher if management were to use some of the company's $ 30 billion in cash to pay a quarterly dividend or buy back shares.
Google stock closed at $ 541.39 on Tuesday, down 13 percent for the year and far off its all-time high of nearly $ 750 three years ago.
The company's uninterrupted streak of prosperity since its August 2004 IPO hasn't hurt, either.
Google can afford to gamble more frequently than most companies because it dominates the Internet's most lucrative market, the ads running alongside search results. And Google has seized on that opportunity in a manner that would make Gordon Gekko proud, beating back its competitors to boost its annual revenue from just $ 86 million in 2001 to nearly $ 30 billion now.
The company, based in Mountain View, Calif., began branching out beyond search well before it went public.
It set up an online news section that compiles the day's top stories in 2002. Just a few months before its August 2004 IPO, Google unveiled a free e-mail service that boasted an unprecedented - and still expanding - amount of space per inbox.
In 2004, it bought an obscure digital mapping service called Keyhole that eventually turned Google into the place to go for directions. Even rival CEOs, such as Yahoo's Carol Bartz, say it's the best around.
More recently, Google created a free mobile operating system called Android that now powers millions of smart phones. This month, it's rolling out technology with Sony that weds traditional television viewing with Web surfing.
Google's expansion into mobile phones and television never seemed like quantum leaps for the company because they are little more than attempts to transplant its advertising model onto other Internet-connected screens that attract a lot of eyeballs.
The company also has poured money into building more widely available and faster ways for people to connect to the Internet, reasoning that it will make money if more Web surfers have the opportunity to use its ubiquitous services.
Schmidt, Google's CEO, frequently tries to defuse the perception that the company is frivolous. He contends the company's formula is disciplined: 70 percent of its resources go to the main search business, 20 percent to other projects connected to search, and 10 percent to initiatives that have nothing to do with search.
It's difficult to argue with the formula so far, said Colin Gillis of the stock market research firm BGC Financial.
"As an analyst, I do hammer them on their (rising) expenses and some of their questionable investments," he said. "But as a user of all their products, I love them. And from a purely personal perspective, I appreciate that Google is trying to use technology to solve the world's problems."

Making sense of Google's seemingly whacky concepts

San Francisco: In its self-proclaimed drive to make the world a better place, Google has immersed itself in far more than Internet search and online ads. But driverless cars and a wind energy farm in the Atlantic Ocean?
It may not always be immediately apparent to frustrated investors - they wish management would be more frugal and focus more on the stock price - but there's usually some calculated logic underlying Google's unconventional strategy.
Google's brain trust - founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin, along with CEO Eric Schmidt - clearly think differently than most corporate leaders, and may eventually encourage more companies to take risks that might not pay off for years, if ever.
The time is ripe for long-term thinking, with memories still fresh of the financial meltdown - a byproduct of Wall Street's demands for companies to deliver ever-higher profits every three months and meet earnings targets set by analysts.
"Everywhere you look in this country, it seems that we are suffering from the consequences of too much short-term thinking," said longtime Silicon Valley forecaster Paul Saffo, managing director of foresight for Discern Analytics.
"Google doesn't have this disease," he said. "It is one of the few lone bright spots we have in that regard."
Even so, it might be difficult to fathom how Google can justify paying for the development of robotic technology that has driven cars thousands of miles on California roads without a major accident and committing potentially hundreds of millions of dollars to help build a wind farm hundreds of miles from the Eastern Seaboard.
With a little imagination, it's easier to see how Google might benefit. For instance, Saffo surmises that the driverless technology eventually could be implanted into a fleet of vehicles used for car sharing.
Google then could use a camera to take new pictures of streets and highways that appear in its online maps, another example of a service that once seemed like a diversion from its Internet search engine but is now an indispensable tool that helps the company sell advertising.
The company announced Tuesday it would buy a 37.5 percent stake in the Atlantic Ocean wind energy project, investing in a network of deepwater transmission lines to bring power from still-to-be-built offshore wind farms.
That makes more sense when you realize Google already sucks up massive amounts of energy from the power grid and expects to consume even more in the next decade as it opens more data centers filled with row upon row of computers to run its Internet services.
And if the value of renewable energy rises, as many analysts expect, Google eventually could even sell its stake for a tidy profit.
Or it could turn out to be a total bust, something Page and Brin warned potential investors could happen in April 2004 when they laid out their iconoclastic approach to business before Google sold its stock in an initial public offering.
"Our long-term focus may simply be the wrong business strategy," they warned. "Competitors may be rewarded for short-term tactics and grow stronger as a result. As potential investors, you should consider the risks around our long-term focus."
The Google founders also told investors that the company would be willing to finance projects with just a 10 percent chance of yielding a return of at least $ 1 billion - bets that seem "very speculative or even strange."
Google's transparency about its unorthodox ways may be one reason the company hasn't been stung yet by an outcry from its shareholders, although most analysts agree the stock price probably would be higher if management were to use some of the company's $ 30 billion in cash to pay a quarterly dividend or buy back shares.
Google stock closed at $ 541.39 on Tuesday, down 13 percent for the year and far off its all-time high of nearly $ 750 three years ago.
The company's uninterrupted streak of prosperity since its August 2004 IPO hasn't hurt, either.
Google can afford to gamble more frequently than most companies because it dominates the Internet's most lucrative market, the ads running alongside search results. And Google has seized on that opportunity in a manner that would make Gordon Gekko proud, beating back its competitors to boost its annual revenue from just $ 86 million in 2001 to nearly $ 30 billion now.
The company, based in Mountain View, Calif., began branching out beyond search well before it went public.
It set up an online news section that compiles the day's top stories in 2002. Just a few months before its August 2004 IPO, Google unveiled a free e-mail service that boasted an unprecedented - and still expanding - amount of space per inbox.
In 2004, it bought an obscure digital mapping service called Keyhole that eventually turned Google into the place to go for directions. Even rival CEOs, such as Yahoo's Carol Bartz, say it's the best around.
More recently, Google created a free mobile operating system called Android that now powers millions of smart phones. This month, it's rolling out technology with Sony that weds traditional television viewing with Web surfing.
Google's expansion into mobile phones and television never seemed like quantum leaps for the company because they are little more than attempts to transplant its advertising model onto other Internet-connected screens that attract a lot of eyeballs.
The company also has poured money into building more widely available and faster ways for people to connect to the Internet, reasoning that it will make money if more Web surfers have the opportunity to use its ubiquitous services.
Schmidt, Google's CEO, frequently tries to defuse the perception that the company is frivolous. He contends the company's formula is disciplined: 70 percent of its resources go to the main search business, 20 percent to other projects connected to search, and 10 percent to initiatives that have nothing to do with search.
It's difficult to argue with the formula so far, said Colin Gillis of the stock market research firm BGC Financial.
"As an analyst, I do hammer them on their (rising) expenses and some of their questionable investments," he said. "But as a user of all their products, I love them. And from a purely personal perspective, I appreciate that Google is trying to use technology to solve the world's problems."

Thursday, October 7, 2010

Google Instant officially launched in India

Google Instant officially launched in India
Google Instant has been accessible here in India for a while now. In fact, we got it on some of our machines (on Google.com) on the launch date itself.
The company has now officially launched it in the Indian market. We suppose it would now work by default on Google.co.in.
Google Instant officially launched in India
Google spoke about this new development:
A few weeks ago we introduced a new way of searching that makes search more interactive and helps you find information more quickly and easily. We called it Google Instant, and today we are excited to be rolling out Instant in India.
Google Instant combines three core features — dynamic results, Autocomplete predictions, and ‘scroll-to-search’ functionality — to deliver smart, predictive results as you type. You can watch the video below that explains Google Instant in greater depth.

Google Instant officially launched in India

Google Instant officially launched in India
Google Instant has been accessible here in India for a while now. In fact, we got it on some of our machines (on Google.com) on the launch date itself.
The company has now officially launched it in the Indian market. We suppose it would now work by default on Google.co.in.
Google Instant officially launched in India
Google spoke about this new development:
A few weeks ago we introduced a new way of searching that makes search more interactive and helps you find information more quickly and easily. We called it Google Instant, and today we are excited to be rolling out Instant in India.
Google Instant combines three core features — dynamic results, Autocomplete predictions, and ‘scroll-to-search’ functionality — to deliver smart, predictive results as you type. You can watch the video below that explains Google Instant in greater depth.

Thursday, September 16, 2010

Congress padyatra ineffective, says BJP

The ruling BJP in Karnataka on Thursday said Congress' defeat in the by-elections to Gulbarga South and Kadur Assembly constituencies showed that its Bellary padayatra on mining issue was ''ineffective''.

''The Congress lost in both which shows that the padyatra has been ineffective. They failed to retain even their seat in Kadur which clearly indicates that people want to vote for improvement and have done so,'' Home Minister V S Acharya told PTI here.

Reacting to BJP's defeat in Gulbarga South Acharya said, "We had hoped to win both the seats but the defeat in Gulbarga South was unexpected." He attributed the victory of JDS candidate Aruna Patil to "sympathy wave".

In the bypolls held on September 13, BJP's Y C Vishwanath wrested the Kadur seat but failed to retain Gulbarga South where Patil defeated Congress's Ajay Singh, son of former Chief Minister Dharam Singh.

The Congress had last month undertaken a 302-km padayatra from Bangalore to Bellary on the issue of illegal mining.

State unit BJP President K S Eshwarappa expressed satisfaction over the results. The outcome had shown the Congress cannot continue to "divide" people in the name of caste, he said referring to the party's defeat in Kadur.

In Gulbarga South, the electorate have rejected "dynastic politics" by dumping Congress nominee Ajay Singh, he said.

He defended the BJP's decision to deny ticket to Aruna, wife of late BJP MLA Chandrasekhara Patil Revoor, standing for elections on a JDS ticket, saying she was fielded due to "indiscipline".

He sought to downplay victory of JDS in Gulbarga by ascribing it to the sympathy factor. The poll verdict was also against the leadership of Siddaramaiah, Dharam Singh and Union Labour Minister Mallikajun Kharge, he claimed.

He said Chief Minister B S Yeddyurappa planned to expand his ministry within a month

Congress padyatra ineffective, says BJP

The ruling BJP in Karnataka on Thursday said Congress' defeat in the by-elections to Gulbarga South and Kadur Assembly constituencies showed that its Bellary padayatra on mining issue was ''ineffective''.

''The Congress lost in both which shows that the padyatra has been ineffective. They failed to retain even their seat in Kadur which clearly indicates that people want to vote for improvement and have done so,'' Home Minister V S Acharya told PTI here.

Reacting to BJP's defeat in Gulbarga South Acharya said, "We had hoped to win both the seats but the defeat in Gulbarga South was unexpected." He attributed the victory of JDS candidate Aruna Patil to "sympathy wave".

In the bypolls held on September 13, BJP's Y C Vishwanath wrested the Kadur seat but failed to retain Gulbarga South where Patil defeated Congress's Ajay Singh, son of former Chief Minister Dharam Singh.

The Congress had last month undertaken a 302-km padayatra from Bangalore to Bellary on the issue of illegal mining.

State unit BJP President K S Eshwarappa expressed satisfaction over the results. The outcome had shown the Congress cannot continue to "divide" people in the name of caste, he said referring to the party's defeat in Kadur.

In Gulbarga South, the electorate have rejected "dynastic politics" by dumping Congress nominee Ajay Singh, he said.

He defended the BJP's decision to deny ticket to Aruna, wife of late BJP MLA Chandrasekhara Patil Revoor, standing for elections on a JDS ticket, saying she was fielded due to "indiscipline".

He sought to downplay victory of JDS in Gulbarga by ascribing it to the sympathy factor. The poll verdict was also against the leadership of Siddaramaiah, Dharam Singh and Union Labour Minister Mallikajun Kharge, he claimed.

He said Chief Minister B S Yeddyurappa planned to expand his ministry within a month

Kashmir's separatist leaders reject outcome of all-party meeting


SRINAGAR: Separatist leaders in Jammu and Kashmir have rejected the outcome of Wednesday's over five-hour-long All-Party meeting, unanimously terming the endeavor a futile and time buying exercise aimed to deny Kashmiris their inalienable right to self-determination.

The chairman of Hurriyat (Geelani) Syed Ali Shah Geelani termed it as a time gaining exercise.

He further said New Delhi and its allies in Kashmir have been creating much hype about the meeting.

"The outcome of the meeting was disappointing and negative for Kashmiris. The pro-India parties stuck to their traditional stand on Kashmir. I have no doubt to say that these meetings have proven to be futile rather time gaining exercise," Geelani said.

Geelani said it is high time for India and its allies in Kashmir to adopt a realistic approach to resolve the dispute.

"I also make it clear that the Conglomerate will not talk with the All Party Delegation during its visit to Kashmir. I reiterate that ongoing movement will continue till our five demands are implemented on ground," Geelani maintained.

Geelani rejected the statement of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh that the protests in Kashmir are instigated by apparently by the pro-freedom groups.

"New Delhi and the state government know the reality and they are trying to divert the attention from the ongoing agitation by blaming pro-freedom parties for violence," he said.

Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front chairman Muhammad Yasin Malik termed the all party meeting a futile exercise.

Malik said in the past 63 years the Kashmir dispute has consumed three generations.

"In 90s, guns were the reference points and it internationally highlighted the Kashmir dispute. After guns, there was a transition of the Kashmiris' movement into a peaceful stage. However, New Delhi has kept the movement lingering at the cost of Kashmiris," Malik said.

He said instead of acknowledging the sacrifices of Kashmiris, the All Party Meeting has left no stone unturned to appease the communal and anti-Kashmir parties.

"The meeting took place at a time when Kashmiris are being killed with impunity and whole Valley is continuously reeling under curfew," he said.

Castigating the BJP for opposing revocation of the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA), Malik said when the party was in power, it engaged even the militant leadership for resolving the Kashmir dispute.


"This shows the BJP's hypocrisy. It is playing politics on the blood of Kashmiris," he said.

Malik warned that if India delays the resolution of the dispute, Kashmiris will be forced to take violent recourse.

"Instead of these futile meetings, India should on priority resolve the dispute taking the aspirations of Kashmiris into consideration. Delaying the vexed issue will have dangerous consequences," Malik maintained.

The chairman of Hurriyat (M), Mirwaiz Umar Farooq termed the All Party Meeting as a façade to hoodwink the international community and Kashmiris.

Kashmir's separatist leaders reject outcome of all-party meeting


SRINAGAR: Separatist leaders in Jammu and Kashmir have rejected the outcome of Wednesday's over five-hour-long All-Party meeting, unanimously terming the endeavor a futile and time buying exercise aimed to deny Kashmiris their inalienable right to self-determination.

The chairman of Hurriyat (Geelani) Syed Ali Shah Geelani termed it as a time gaining exercise.

He further said New Delhi and its allies in Kashmir have been creating much hype about the meeting.

"The outcome of the meeting was disappointing and negative for Kashmiris. The pro-India parties stuck to their traditional stand on Kashmir. I have no doubt to say that these meetings have proven to be futile rather time gaining exercise," Geelani said.

Geelani said it is high time for India and its allies in Kashmir to adopt a realistic approach to resolve the dispute.

"I also make it clear that the Conglomerate will not talk with the All Party Delegation during its visit to Kashmir. I reiterate that ongoing movement will continue till our five demands are implemented on ground," Geelani maintained.

Geelani rejected the statement of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh that the protests in Kashmir are instigated by apparently by the pro-freedom groups.

"New Delhi and the state government know the reality and they are trying to divert the attention from the ongoing agitation by blaming pro-freedom parties for violence," he said.

Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front chairman Muhammad Yasin Malik termed the all party meeting a futile exercise.

Malik said in the past 63 years the Kashmir dispute has consumed three generations.

"In 90s, guns were the reference points and it internationally highlighted the Kashmir dispute. After guns, there was a transition of the Kashmiris' movement into a peaceful stage. However, New Delhi has kept the movement lingering at the cost of Kashmiris," Malik said.

He said instead of acknowledging the sacrifices of Kashmiris, the All Party Meeting has left no stone unturned to appease the communal and anti-Kashmir parties.

"The meeting took place at a time when Kashmiris are being killed with impunity and whole Valley is continuously reeling under curfew," he said.

Castigating the BJP for opposing revocation of the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA), Malik said when the party was in power, it engaged even the militant leadership for resolving the Kashmir dispute.


"This shows the BJP's hypocrisy. It is playing politics on the blood of Kashmiris," he said.

Malik warned that if India delays the resolution of the dispute, Kashmiris will be forced to take violent recourse.

"Instead of these futile meetings, India should on priority resolve the dispute taking the aspirations of Kashmiris into consideration. Delaying the vexed issue will have dangerous consequences," Malik maintained.

The chairman of Hurriyat (M), Mirwaiz Umar Farooq termed the All Party Meeting as a façade to hoodwink the international community and Kashmiris.

Saturday, September 4, 2010

Google to Announce Visual Search Updates on 9/8

 
Google is hosting a special media event on September 8 to showcase, what the company is now teasing as, "latest technological innovation" and "inside look at the evolution of Google search" in San Francisco, California. Though not much is known, Google had introduced several visual search products for the Android platform in the past, including Google Shopper and Google Goggles. It is also unclear if Google's announcement will be limited to Android and/or web search, but the company had recently purchased Like.com for its visual search technology portfolio in an effort to expand search to iOS devices, including the   iPhone .

Google to Announce Visual Search Updates on 9/8

 
Google is hosting a special media event on September 8 to showcase, what the company is now teasing as, "latest technological innovation" and "inside look at the evolution of Google search" in San Francisco, California. Though not much is known, Google had introduced several visual search products for the Android platform in the past, including Google Shopper and Google Goggles. It is also unclear if Google's announcement will be limited to Android and/or web search, but the company had recently purchased Like.com for its visual search technology portfolio in an effort to expand search to iOS devices, including the   iPhone .

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More

 
Design by Free WordPress Themes | Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premium Blogger Themes | Dcreators